首页> 外文OA文献 >Optical verification and in-vitro characterization of two commercially available acoustic bubble counters for cardiopulmonary bypass systems
【2h】

Optical verification and in-vitro characterization of two commercially available acoustic bubble counters for cardiopulmonary bypass systems

机译:用于体外循环系统的两个市售声气泡计数器的光学验证和体外表征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Gaseous microemboli (GME) introduced during cardiac surgery are considered as a potential source of morbidity, which has driven the development of the first bubble counters. Two new generation bubble counters, introduced in the early 2000s, claim correct sizing and counting of GME. This in-vitro study aims to validate the accuracy of two bubble counters using monodisperse bubbles in a highly controlled setting at low GME concentrations. Monodisperse GME with a radius of 43 µm were produced in a microfluidic chip. Directly after their formation, they were injected one-by-one into the BCC200 and the EDAC sensors. GME size and count, measured with the bubble counters, were optically verified using high-speed imaging. During best-case scenarios or low GME concentrations of GME with a size of 43 µm in radius in an in-vitro setup, the BCC200 overestimates GME size by a factor of 2 to 3 while the EDAC underestimates the average GME size by at least a factor of two. The BCC200 overestimates the GME concentration by approximately 20% while the EDAC overestimates the concentration by nearly one order of magnitude. Nevertheless, the calculated total GME volume is only over-predicted by a factor 2 since the EDAC underestimates the actual GME size. For the BCC200, the total GME volume was over-predicted by 25 times due to the over-estimation of GME size. The measured errors in the absolute sizing/counting of GME do not imply that all results obtained using the bubble counters are insignificant or invalid. A relative change in bubble size or bubble concentration can accurately be measured. However, care must be taken in the interpretation of the results and their absolute values. Moreover, the devices cannot be used interchangeably when reporting GME activity. Nevertheless, both devices can be used to study the relative air removal characteristics of CPB components or for the quantitative monitoring of GME production during CPB interventions
机译:心脏外科手术期间引入的气态微栓塞(GME)被认为是潜在的发病源,这推动了第一个气泡计数器的发展。在2000年代初期推出的两款新一代气泡计数器要求正确调整GME的大小和计数。这项体外研究旨在通过在低GME浓度下高度受控的环境中使用单分散气泡验证两个气泡计数器的准确性。在微流控芯片中生产了半径为43 µm的单分散GME。它们形成后,立即将它们一对一注入BCC200和EDAC传感器中。使用气泡计数器测量的GME大小和计数已使用高速成像进行了光学验证。在最佳情况下或在体外设置中,半径为43 µm的GME的GME浓度较低时,BCC200会高估GME大小2到3倍,而EDAC会低估平均GME大小至少2个百分点。两倍。 BCC200高估了GME浓度约20%,而EDAC高估了浓度近一个数量级。但是,由于EDAC低估了实际GME的大小,因此计算出的GME的总体积仅被高估了2倍。对于BCC200,由于对GME尺寸的高估,总GME体积被高估了25倍。 GME的绝对大小/计数中所测量的误差并不意味着使用气泡计数器获得的所有结果都是微不足道的或无效的。气泡尺寸或气泡浓度的相对变化可以准确测量。但是,在解释结果及其绝对值时必须小心。此外,报告GME活动时,这些设备不能互换使用。尽管如此,两种设备都可用于研究CPB组件的相对空气去除特性,或用于在CPB干预期间定量监测GME的产生

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号